Model Policy Language
What does a best-in-class forest sourcing policy include?
Prohibitions against deforestation, conversion, and degradation across entire supply chain.
Clear, scientifically rigorous definitions of what constitutes deforestation, conversion and degradation.
Deforestation: The Accountability Framework Initiative (AFi) defines deforestation as, “Loss of natural forest as a result of (i) conversion to agriculture or other non-forest land use; (ii) conversion to a tree plantation; or (iii) severe and sustained degradation.”
Conversion: As defined by AFi, “Loss of a natural ecosystem as a result of its replacement with agriculture or another land use, or due to a profound and sustained change in a natural ecosystem’s species composition, structure, or function.”
Degradation: “Changes within a natural ecosystem that significantly and negatively affect its species composition, structure, and/or function and reduce the ecosystem’s capacity to supply products, support biodiversity, and/or deliver ecosystem services.” (Source: AFi)
Human rights policy
FPIC and adherence to the U.N.’s Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People.
Zero tolerance of violence and intimidation toward Human Rights Defenders (HRDs)
Annual disclosure of entire forest footprint –i.e. the entirety of areas of forest that are impacted by a company’s supply chain, both upstream and downstream- including targets to reduce footprint. (Note: Rainforest Action Network has a useful methodology that companies can use to determine and disclose their forest footprints.)
Ongoing robust and transparent supply chain monitoring of deforestation, conversion, degradation, and human rights violations, verified by a credible, independent third party.
A non-compliance protocol with clear thresholds for suspension or termination of suppliers or investors for policy violations, as well as a process for remedying issues and requirements for bringing suspended suppliers back into policy compliance.
A grievance process is in place aligned with the U.N.’s Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.
Clear application of policy across all commodities, the entire corporate group, and all direct and indirect suppliers.
Furthermore, a policy is only as strong as its implementation. Investors must look for evidence of clear and ongoing application of environmental and social policies by any company with which they engage and invest. Investors can typically find these commitments disclosed across a company’s forest sourcing or deforestation policy, human rights and human rights defender policies, supplier code of conduct, responsible sourcing standards, and broader sustainability reporting.
Best practices for corporate engagement and stewardship
Read the sourcing policy and corporate disclosure documents.
Go deeper. Ask companies how, not just whether, they monitor for compliance with their policies. How often do they review their suppliers’ footprints? What information do they require suppliers to share with them? How do they verify that information?
Press for disclosure. Sunlight is the best disinfectant. Variability between corporate disclosures and reporting leads to increased financial risk. Companies should disclose their entire forest footprint to the forest unit level including volumes and corporate groups.
Look for trade group membership and policy positions. Sourcing policies and regulatory policy go hand-in-hand. Often, companies will have sourcing policies articulating a specific position but take positions on legislation and regulations (either individually or as members of a particular trade group) that undermine progress on the stated issue. It is critical that companies’ stances on government policies reflect and reinforce halting and reversing deforestation, conversion, and degradation globally.
Look for executive incentives tied to strong environmental performance.
Commonly Heard Talking Points
1. What is the full scope of your forest-risk commodity footprint (commodities, geographies, and product categories), and what percent is currently covered by your DCF/traceability program?
2. How do you define forest degradation, and what steps do you take to avoid or reduce degradation impacts in your supply chain?
3. What is your traceability depth today (e.g., country -> subnational -> forest management unit), and what is your timeline to reach your target end state?
4. What percentage of total volume is third-party certified, by scheme and by geography? Which schemes are acceptable where, and why? Do you review certification audit findings or corrective action plans? How do findings change sourcing decisions?
5. Do you have a time-bound Deforestation and Conversion Free/No Deforestation, No Peat, No Exploitation commitment with a clear cutoff date? If not, are you willing to adopt one?
6. Do you have a formal Free, Prior and Informed Consent commitment (a standard for Indigenous Peoples’ rights affecting lands and resources), and how is it built into supplier requirements, monitoring, and grievance mechanisms?
7. Do you source from public lands in the U.S. (directly or indirectly)? Do you anticipate changes to this in the next 1–3 years, and what safeguards apply?
8. How do you define and operationalize ‘unknown’ and ‘controversial’ sources, and what happens when material is flagged?
9. Will you publish annual forest sourcing disclosures with consistent metrics (volumes by geography, traceability depth, certification by scheme, target progress, and grievance outcomes)?
10. Do you maintain a formal grievance mechanism covering deforestation, degradation, and human rights impacts in your supply chains? How many grievances have been filed in the past three years, how were they resolved, and how are outcomes publicly reported?
Due diligence questions
Talking Point Library
Click a card to view suggested follow-ups and evidence requests.
Terminology Clarity Guide
Cut through confusing corporate disclosures and identify misleading claims.
Forest Clarity — Terminology Guide
Search, filter, and browse terms.